In recent months, landlords and city officials have been debating a proposed expansion of HMO licensing. HMO stands for “House in Multiple Occupancy,” which is a type of housing that is shared by more than one household. The proposed expansion would require landlords to obtain a license for any property they rent out as an HMO.
Proponents of the expansion argue that it would help protect tenants from unscrupulous landlords who may not be providing safe and suitable housing. They point to the fact that HMOs are often overcrowded and lack basic amenities such as fire safety equipment, which can put tenants at risk. They also argue that the licensing would help ensure that landlords are meeting their legal obligations to tenants, such as providing adequate heating and hot water.
Opponents of the expansion argue that it would be too costly and burdensome for landlords. They point out that the cost of obtaining a license could be prohibitive for small landlords, and that the additional paperwork and inspections required could be overly time-consuming. They also argue that the licensing could lead to a decrease in the availability of affordable housing, as landlords may be less willing to rent out HMOs if they have to pay for a license.
The debate over the proposed expansion of HMO licensing is ongoing, and it remains to be seen what the outcome will be. In the meantime, both landlords and tenants should be aware of their rights and responsibilities when it comes to renting out or living in an HMO. Landlords should make sure they are meeting all legal requirements, while tenants should make sure they are getting a safe and suitable place to live.